Causal Rewrite–ohsosillybones

Music and Learning

The causal relationship between music education and learning in other academic areas is crucial in providing the insight as to why music education is an equal to math and science in the education system. Although there is need for more rigorous research on the subject, there is credible reason for why music and the arts must be upheld at a higher standard by all education institutions. Many connections have been made between music education and academic success, cognitive ability, and even entrepreneurial identity.

In the article “The Arts in Education: Evaluating the Evidence for a Causal Link,” Winner and Hetland establish that the undeniable learning transfer effects of music education justify its place in any curriculum. But, even if that were not so, there is no reason to justify the importance of music and arts education based on if it leads to stronger skills in math or science. We don’t justify mathematics education based on if it leads to stronger skills in English therefore we should not justify the presence of music education based on if it leads to stronger skills in other traditional academic areas.

A transfer of learning occurs through the use of previously acquired skills and knowledge in a new learning or problem-solving situation. As stated by Steve Oare in his article “Music Education and 21st Century Skills,” music education provides students with opportunities to develop foundational skills that promote social and emotional well-being, a sense of responsibility, strong character, adaptability, and a strong work ethic. It has the ability to awaken a students curiosity, initiative, persistence, leadership, and social and cultural awareness. More specifically, when looking at the learning transfer of music education to entrepreneurial education, as examined in Jefremovs and Kozlinska’s article “Music education in adolescence – A pathway to entrepreneurial identity?” clear similarities have been identified in how one develops an entrepreneurial identity versus the skills developed within music education.

Characteristics of an entrepreneurial identity include creativity, proactivity, flexibility, the ability to generate new ideas, and the competency in which to make them happen. Similarly, music education is known to develop adaptability and openness to new possibilities, among many other entrepreneurial characteristics. The creativity, sensory memory, and ability to work with others that music education helps to develop also has a lot in common with the qualities of entrepreneurial individuals. Music education is an emotionally intensive activity while at the same time being focused on discipline, regular practice, and accountability to peers. Similarly, any entrepreneurial project is extremely focused on being passion-driven while requiring time investments and a conscious commitment to the task at hand. The ability to create and work in teams is also a distinct characteristic of both entrepreneurial individuals and musical individuals. Entrepreneurship is often defined as the “creation of something from nothing” which is also how the act of making music can often be defined. These evident similarities and the significant positive effects of music education on the strength of entrepreneurial identity suggest a likely causal relationship, as concluded by Jefremovs and Kozlinska. The findings of Winner and Hetland as well as Jefremovs and Kozlinska show that the skills learned in music education not only help the development of an entrepreneurial identity but also aid in the development of foundational skills needed in other traditional academic areas.

Music education is often excluded from the “traditional academic areas” mostly due to the fact that some argue that music programs detract from a student’s academics. They believe that spending too much time practicing, going on trips, and attending performances hinders a student’s ability to focus on their studies. Although these conclusions are valid, what is often overlooked is the synergy that occurs between the different areas of academic study; art and music, math, and science. Specifically, music and mathematics have been shown to have many correlations. The great mathematician Albert Einstein is said to have sat and played music when he was stuck on a mathematical problem, as stated in the article “Correlation Between Math and Music Ability.” In the Brain Balance article it is also said how, at some level, all music is math. It’s about time signatures, beats per minute, and formulaic progression which therefore reinforces parts of the brain used in mathematics. It is also said that taking the time to appreciate music is a reward on its own, for people interested in the success of students that time could also improve mathematics and other academic skills.

Appreciation for the finer things is inherently what connects all aspects of academic study. Without the learned ability to appreciate and nurture beauty in all things there would be no mathematicians, scientists, or musicians. “A mathematician, like a painter or a poet, is a maker of patterns. If his patterns are more permanent than theirs, it is because they are made of ideas. His patterns, like the painter’s or the poet’s must be beautiful; the ideas, like the colors or the words, must fit together in a harmonious way,” as quoted from English mathematician G. H. Hardy. Music appreciation directly correlates to the appreciation of harmony and structure in math. Like patterns in music there are patterns and formulas in math, like experiments in science the relationships between chords, melodies, and harmonies all have different effects dependent on many interchangeable variables. If the appreciation for the inherent “beauty” in all things can be nurtured through music education then an appreciation and passion can be developed for the things that hold a similar type of beauty in the worlds of mathematics and science.

Although seemingly unimportant to those who only focus on standardized test scores and only care about performance in “traditional academic areas”, music education has been proven to be very impactful in the development of foundational academic and life skills, academic success, and even entrepreneurial ability. Music education is also extremely impactful in the way it correlates to other aspects of academics in mathematics and science. With the appreciation of the fact that music does in fact build foundational skills needed in “traditional academic areas” and the fact that skills learned in music education have been shown to transfer to many areas including entrepreneurial ability, there is undeniable reason for why music education must be upheld in the same light as mathematics and science.

References

Correlation between math and Music ability. Brain Balance Achievement Centers. Retrieved April 6, 2022, from https://www.brainbalancecenters.com/blog/correlation-between-math-and-music-ability

M&Mquotes.html. Retrieved April 6, 2022, from http://www.math.utep.edu/faculty/lesser/M&Mquotes.html#:~:text=%EF%BF%BDA%20mathematician%2C%20like%20a,they%20are%20made%20of%20ideas.&text=%EF%BF%BDMusic%20is%20true.

Music education in adolescence – journals.sagepub.com. Retrieved April 7, 2022, from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09504222211042282

Oare, S. (2017, July 3). Music Education and 21st Century skills. Kansas Music Review. Retrieved April 6, 2022, from https://kansasmusicreview.com/2017/07/03/music-education-and-21st-century-skills/#:~:text=Music%20activities%20provide%20students%20with,and%20a%20strong%20work%20ethic.

WWW-JSTOR-org.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu. Retrieved April 7, 2022, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/3333636

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Causal Rewrite–ohsosillybones

  1. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    I’m not sure that’s true, OhSo.

    I think if you asked most reasonable people (your target audience 🙂 ), they would acknowledge that exposure to all sorts of human knowledge and capability is beneficial for students. But they might also contend that “coddling every special interest” has a cost that deprives schools of the resources to concentrate on “fundamental education” or “basic pedagogical subjects” like Math and Science that “keep us competitive” in a “world economy” or some such explanation.

    Don’t most critics of “electives” or “the arts” or “the soft subjects” or “the humanities” or whatever they want to call it, consider the question of whether to fund and support music education to be a “zero sum game” in which every dollar and resource that goes into music has to COST another more “obviously beneficial” program or curriculum?

    A person making that argument should be asked to prove that cutbacks in art programs, music, history, communications, what-have-you, have somehow achieved a revolution in our achievements in math and science. Following cutbacks to arts curricula, have we (without anybody noticing) suddenly achieved world dominance in physics? Has the “brain drain” reversed itself? Are we now EXPORTING the world’s best scientific minds, or are we still the world’s BIGGEST IMPORTER of scientific expertise from countries that somehow manage to produce world-class scientists with their public education programs? (Just asking.)

  2. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    So, you might need a more Negative than a Positive causal approach. Ask a reasonable person and she will say,

    Sure. Every student has different skills. Every student will thrive in an environment that offers a broad range of intellectual and social stimulus so she can gravitate to the option that furthers her best possible fulfillment of her intellectual capabilities and temperament. A curriculum that focuses only on Standardized Test Scores in math and science guarantees the failure of every student whose skills lie elsewhere. Worse than failing that student, such a narrow-minded curriculum WASTES the potential of students with OTHER SKILLS and capabilities. And finally, it ignores the synergy at the heart of every valid education system. Science requires a knowledge of structure and harmony. Math requires the recognition of melodies and keys. NO ONE can be a world-class scientist who doesn’t appreciate the balance of conflicting forces. NO ONE can be a world-class mathematician who thinks numbers don’t sing.

  3. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Sounds academic:

    The causal relationship between music education and learning in other academic areas is crucial in providing the insight as to why music education should be considered as an equal to math and science in the education system.

    SUBJECTS AND VERBS: Relationship/Is and Education/Be Considered
    MY REACTION: Huh?

    Doesn’t sound academic:

    Music education makes math and science students better mathematicians and scientists.

    ROBUST COMPONENTS: Music/Makes Better
    MY REACTION: Really? Tell me how.

    Puts me to sleep:

    is crucial in providing the insight as to why random noun should be considered

    —Repeat this exercise on every sentence. 🙂

  4. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    In the article “The Arts in Education: Evaluating the Evidence for a Causal Link,” Winner and Hetland establish that there is no reason to justify the importance of music and arts education based on if it leads to stronger skills in math or science. We don’t justify mathematics education based on if it leads to stronger skills in English therefore we should not justify the presence of music education based on if it leads to stronger skills in other traditional academic areas. The study of its learning transfer effects are important educationally and scientifically nonetheless.

    This would be SO MUCH more effective if you made the positive claim for Winner and Hetland before insisting that the arts are not the poor orphan begging. What if:

    In the article “The Arts in Education: Evaluating the Evidence for a Causal Link,” Winner and Hetland establish that the undeniable learning transfer effects of music education justify its place in any curriculum. But, even if that were not so, we don’t justify . . . .

    Notice also in the block quote I fixed your end-of-quotation punctuation.

  5. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Your third paragraph bleeds off the page top and bottom. Hence, it is too long. It must contain at least two main ideas. Identify them and break the paragraph accordingly. Then be sure each adequately develops its idea.

  6. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    You keep making the same end-of-quotation punctuation error.
    Commas and periods go INSIDE the quotes always.

  7. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Somewhere in paragraph 3 (or 3a, 3b) you need to make the CLEAR transition from: We never SAID we made better Scientists to WE MAKE BETTER ENTREPRENEURS!

    That alters my recommendation for Paragraph 1, obviously, AND demonstrates how unclear your Introduction was about your intentions.

    (Personal Note: I think many of the characteristics you cite in P3—discipline, regular practice, curiosity, initiative, persistence—WOULD also make better scientists and mathematicians, but you don’t have to emphasize them if you don’t want to.)

  8. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    OhSo, I react to essays, with Replies, as I read them, for the benefit of the Author who wants to know how the reader is receiving the argument in real time. Otherwise, I would have known that in P4, you’re back to saying that, in fact, music education DOES make better mathematicians.

    I offer this observation to encourage you to be clearer about your primary claims as you proceed. Be a good tour guide. An overview of the route we’re going to take would be helpful in this case.

  9. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    You’ve got such a strong and defensible argument here, OhSo, it deserves a rigorous rewrite to boil down and deliver the main course in bite-size portions.

    The conclusion puts me to sleep.

Leave a reply to davidbdale Cancel reply