Prisons Make Prisoners
Prison rehabilitation services are meant to make people better and prevent future crimes, but they in fact accomplish the opposite in most cases. Not only do prisons not harbor an environment for rehabilitation, but they are also places where people often become worse versions of themselves. There is strong evidence that the prison system fails to prevent future offenses, and the negative environment can only lead to bleak outcomes after a prisoner is released. Prison actively makes people worse and doesn’t prevent recidivism that is meant to be reduced by their rehabilitation services.
Before making the case that the effect of prisons is negative on individuals, it is important to address that they fail to do what they are meant to do: keep communities safe and reduce crime in a specific area. A big building packed from wall to wall with criminals encourages violence and despair, and the prison environment has rescued very few inmates from a life of crime. In the early chapters of Jens Soering’s “An Expensive Way to Make Bad People Worse: An Essay on Prison Reform from an Insider’s Perspective,” he debunks the myth that prisons have a measurable positive impact on society when it comes to preventing crimes.
In one well-known California study, the 300% growth of that state’s penitentiary system in the 1980s was shown to reduce non-violent crimes like burglary marginally, but rapes and murder hardly at all. Even the US Department of Justice realizes that locking up as many felons as possible ‘does not appear to achieve a large reduction in crime [but] can cause an increase in prisoner population.’
Prison environments that fail to reduce crime must be held under the microscope. That is because the common factor in 100% of cases where an offender is sent back to prison is that they went through the system in the first place. When looking closely into the treatment of prisoners it is clear why this lack of prevention is the case.
A significant effort in prison rehabilitation services relies on work training for future placement, but this training often does not suit what is necessary for real-world life. In the Criminology and Criminal Justice article, “‘The prison doesn’t talk to you about getting out of prison’: On why prisons in England and Wales fail to rehabilitate prisoners,” these work programs are just one of the many factors of failed rehabilitation.
We heard that work opportunities within the prison are often limited, and the nature of the work is often experienced as repetitive and mundane, which does little to develop transferable skills and improve future opportunities.
Many of the job placements rely on luck, rather than what the prisoner might suit best and find the most success in. At a minmum, it should be the responsbilty of a prison to include promoting honest work and leaving prisoners prepared. After programs like this, prisoners are left with skills that are not useful and an even discoreg them from seeking any work after being relased. It is easy to see how this treament would forcebly push prisoners back into a life of crime.
This feeling of hopelessness after leaving prison is discussed in The Prison Journal piece, “Rehabilitation Programs for Incarcerated Drug Offenders in Malaysia: Experience-Based Perspectives on Reintegration and Recidivism”. Re-offenders told of their experiences which often included leaving prison feeling powerless in their outside life.
Participants felt helpless, hopeless, and powerless after multiple negative postprison experiences. These feelings developed over time and resulted in negative self-perceptions, low self-confidence, and low self-esteem.
No one expects prisoners to be very happy while incarcerated, but constantly pumping out low self-esteem individuals with little to no skill after they are released will only increase recidivism rates.
Mental illness and its relation to crime is a large and difficult topic in itself, but it is simple to determine how negative the effect of prison is on those individuals. Prison systems often do not offer the necessary faculties to support these individuals, and in some cases cause more harm to their well-being and mental state. This relationship is analyzed in Craig Haney’s essay “ “Madness” and penal confinement: Some observations on mental illness and prison pain.” Haney puts emphasis on the large number of prisoners who are considered mentally ill, and how the harsh treatment given in prisons can leave with lasting consequences.
These practices can result in a large number of mentally ill prisoners cycling back and forth between mainline prison housing and various forms of isolated confinement, a pattern that poses especially significant risks to their well-being. In many instances, their long-term mental health is placed in grave jeopardy as a result. For some of them, their deterioration, decompensation, and even more serious consequences (in the form of self-harm and suicide) may prove irreversible (e.g. Kaba et al., 2014).
This is unacceptable behavior for an already suffering group of people, and the mental pain can extend to anyone who has dealt with the prison system. Haney points out that these people are a sizable minority, with the Bureau of Justice Statistics estimating that fully 43% of prisoners in the U.S suffer from mental health problems including major depression. There are clear reasons why this treatment is a common association in prison suicides, especially among the mentally ill. Signs of worsening problems can oftentimes be ignored or unnoticed until it is too late.
Making people better is a good goal that is constatnly failed inside a prison environmentt. If prisons aren’t preventing crime in the way so many of us are led to believe, it is important to question if they are instead making things worse. Building more prisons doesn’t reduce crime, it only houses more criminals. It is not surprising when looking at how prisoners have been treated and the lack of effort put into rehabilitating them that recidivism is still rampant. Prisons only create worse prisoners who are less equipped for outside life, and this ultimately does not prevent recidivism.
References
Bullock, K., & Bunce, A. (2020). “‘The prison doesn’t talk to you about getting out of prison’: On why prisons in England and Wales fail to rehabilitate prisoners.” Criminology & Criminal Justice, 20(1), 111–127.
Cheah, P. K., Unnithan, N. P., & Raran, A. M. S. (2020). “Rehabilitation Programs for Incarcerated Drug Offenders in Malaysia: Experience-Based Perspectives on Reintegration and Recidivism” The Prison Journal, 100(2), 201–223.
Haney, C. (2017). “Madness” and penal confinement: Some observations on mental illness and prison pain.” Punishment & Society, 19(3), 310–326.
Söring Jens. : “An Expensive Way to Make Bad People Worse: An Essay on Prison Reform from an Insider’s Perspective.” Lantern Books, 2004.
alwaystired247
AnonymousStudent
azntaco
beforeverge
BigBabyBaller
bitagaming
breakingbad1820
Caravan
cinderella1013
davidbdale
Yankeelover18
fatboy489zt
giantsfan224
glacierfreeze21
gobirds17
green0728
gymrat230
hollyp715
Gir
jerseymikes1106
jesusisking1738
jetsfan806
Kenneth Alex Krug
manipulator66
mercythyhealer14
mochaatrain
oni
powerranger
peanut2348
pinkcottoncandy4
princess01430
redbird1123
rubes1256
shxrkbait
sillyinternetperson
soulpond47240
spatel8267
stingingcrib5
tacotyphoon
thepersonindisguise
usmnt23
worldofjuice999
xephos1
Counterintuitive Fall 2022 
Manipulator, I left this reply to your question at
It should be easy, I would think, to find plenty of evidence that prison is a terrible influence on a convict’s personality. The basic illogic of expecting years of confinement in close quarters with thousands of convicts to improve anyone’s social skills or provide them with healthy role models is quite obvious. Doesn’t it seem more likely that, when one’s community is comprised entirely of criminals, an inmate will be schooled by association in criminal thinking and attitudes? That is an inherently Causal argument: convicts go in bad and come out worse. Of course, it’s not enough simply to say so. What have you found for evidence that prisoners are MORE LIKELY, for example, to steal from one another, or assault one another, while in prison, than they were before they were locked up? You don’t need to track recidivism rates following release to demonstrate that prison itself creates or increases criminality. Are there crime rate statistics inside prisons? Surely studies have proved that overcrowded, poor facilities, lack of services, boredom, inactivity, separation from family and friends, and disengagement from the wider community all contribute to despair and mental ill-health. That clear causal path can’t possibly result in rehabilitation. Prison reformers have been complaining so for generations with, I imagine, ample evidence.
I wrote most of my essay before your recommendation comment but I picked an argument that was similar. I would like to know if my arguments are clear and if they support my overall claim well.
Yes, Manipulator, once I translate them from negative to positive statements, your arguments are clear and support your overall thesis that prisons fail to rehabilitate, that they in fact exacerbate criminality.
Before I show you what I mean about negative statements, I acknowledge you’ve made clear you’re trying to prove a negative first: The Prisons Don’t Rehabilitate. But the preponderance of negatively-phrased claims subliminally makes readers wonder what you’re in fact proving.
You may not be able to, or want to, replace all these phrases, but do consider them:
Prison rehabilitation services are meant to make people better and prevent future crimes, but this has never been the reality.
—Prison rehabilitation services are meant to make people better and prevent future crimes, but they accomplish the opposite.
Not only do prisons not harbor an environment for rehabilitation, but they are also places where people often become worse versions of themselves.
—Not only are prisons a bad environment for rehabilitation, they actually lead to increased criminality.
There is little evidence prison does anything to help prevent a criminal from re-offending, and the negative environment can only lead to bleak outcomes after a prisoner is released.
—There is ample evidence that prison fails to prevent future offenses, and the negative environment can only lead to bleak outcomes after a prisoner is released.
A big building pact with criminals only succeeds in being that, and the environment of prison has helped very few people get out of a life of crime.
—A big building PACKED with criminals encourages violence and despair, and the environment of prison has rescued very few inmates from a life of crime.
Prisons that fail to reduce crime must be put under the microscope when it comes to recidivism.
—Prisons that fail to reduce crime cannot claim to reduce recidivism [pretty obviously a tautology when we phrase it this way, isn’t it?].
When looking closely into the treatment of prisoners it is clear why this lack of prevention is the case.
—Harsh treatment of prisoners contributes nothing to rehabilitation.
It might not be the prison system’s job that formerly incarcerated find work, but their responsibility should at the least include promoting it and leaving prisoners prepared.
—At a minimum, prisons should promote the value of honest work.
After programs like this, prisoners are left with skills that are not useful and an even worse outlook on work than they might have had come into the system with.
—At their worst, these programs provide only useless skills and discourage prisoners from seeking work at all.
It is difficult to see how this treatment is meant to encourage a clean life, rather than push prisoners back into one of crime.
—Clearly, this maltreatment is more likely to nudge prisoners back into crime.
No one expects prisoners to be very happy while incarcerated, but constantly pumping out low self-esteem individuals with little to no skill after they are released is not going to decrease recidivism rates.
—Incarceration is supposed to punish by depriving prisoners of their freedom, but constantly pumping out low self-esteem individuals with few or useless skills only encourages recidivism.
Prison systems often do not offer the necessary faculties to support these individuals, and in some cases cause more harm to their well-being and mental state.
—Most prisons lack the faculties to support the mentally ill, and in some cases exacerbate their conditions.
Haney points out that these people are not a small minority, with the Bureau of Justice Statistics estimating that around 43% of prisoners in the U.S suffer from mental health problems including major depression.
—Haney points out that these people are a sizable minority, with the Bureau of Justice Statistics estimating that fully 43% of prisoners in the U.S suffer from mental health problems including major depression.
If prisons aren’t preventing crime in the way so many of us are led to believe, it is important to question what impact they are actually having on their inmates.
—If prisons aren’t preventing crime in the way so many of us are led to believe, it is fair to ask if they’re making things worse.
More prisons don’t mean less crime, it only means a bigger population of incarcerated people.
—Building more prisons doesn’t reduce crime, it only houses more criminals.
It is not surprising when looking at how prisoners have been treated and the lack of effort put into rehabilitating them that recidivism is still rampant.
—The obvious consequence of maltreating prisoners instead of rehabilitating them is more recidivism.
Prisons only create worse prisoners who are less equipped for outside life, and this ultimately does not prevent recidivism.
—Prisons that increase criminal tendencies are responsible for recidivism.
The results are not always perfect sentences, Manipulator, but I hope you’ll suddenly recognize how often you’ve favored indirect claims where bold positive declarations would have been easier to follow and endorse.
Provisionally graded.
This post is always eligible for a Regrade following significant Revisions.
I fixed your Block Quotes. WordPress has a function for this. Do you need a tutorial?