Definition Rewrite-shxrkbait

Mass Murder vs. Serial Killer:
The Differences in Murder Typology

Mass murderers are not as psychologically troubled as sequential murderers. Noteworthy distinctions between mass killings and serial killings prevail in the nature and timing of the crime. Although not the most common, mass murder and serial murder are the two most exhibited classifications of murders. Mass murderers terrorize the public by slaughtering victims all at once and often at random. Serial killers induce fear by patiently selecting victims and killing in a pattern over a period of time. The fear of murder at random and the large-scale media coverage of these events are what make serial killers and mass murders the most notorious and intriguing killers to the public. We are urged to be alert and fearful, but we are rarely at risk of becoming victims, at least statistically. The odds of winning the Mega Million lottery are higher than becoming a victim of mass and serial murder.

Similar to serial killings, mass murders are methodically planned to wreak havoc on the general population. The systematic planning both types of killers demonstrate leaves no room to question the sanity of the killer. If insanity were to play a role in the killings, at least in a legal sense, the killer would kill without a plan or any knowledge of the crimes they are committing. The sole phenomenon of a killer being consciously aware of their conduct leads to the generated fear of the public.

Mass murderers are defined as those who kill three or more people within a time constraint of twenty-four hours. Mass murders occur more frequently, or are observed more briskly by law enforcement, than a string of serial murders. We are, statistically speaking, more likely to be victims of a mass murder than a serial killing. Most notably, mass murderers typically kill all of their victims at the same time or within seconds/minutes of each other. In some instances, mass murder has been separated by hours, but never days. The mass murderer type is typically a white male whose age ranges from 30s-40s. The victims of mass murder are, in most cases, strangers who happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. The family annihilator is an exception, as their victims are members of their family. The actions carried out by the killer are methodically planned out. The most common cause for these mass casualties is anger or revenge towards a certain location. It is important to note that mass murderers are often confused with serial killers, but they are very distinct in nature. Unlike serial killers, the motives behind mass murders are almost never caused by mental illness.

Park Elliot Dietz in “Mass, serial, and sensational homicides” defines mass murder constraints by stating “surely a murderer who kills half the requisite number of victims at one site and then travels directly to another site where the other half are killed ought to qualify as a mass murderer, as would one who killed a sufficient number of victims while shooting from a moving vehicle or traveling aboard a train, ship, or aircraft. I would therefore ignore location or distance in the definition of mass murder.” With these constraints in mind we are able to establish that although there is a time limit to defining mass murder, the location or the number of locations where the murders take place does not disqualify a string of murders from being defined as mass homicide.

Inside the classification of mass murders, befalls three measured varieties. All three subdivisions operate with a common goal, to inflict maximum damage on a specific group of people or a specific geographic location. The classifications of mass murder are broken into categories: the family annihilator, the psuedocommando, and the set-and-run killers. The difference in these types of mass murders is important to note to help better understand the cause and how we can prevent ourselves from becoming victims in the future. For mass murders, these acts are carried out quickly and can wipe many people out in a single incident. 

The first typology of mass murders is classified as family annihilators. The cause for this typically stems from marital problems and/or mental illness/addiction. This is the only type in which the victims are always people the murderer knows and has a personal relationship with, which goes against the common theme of wrong place, wrong time. The nature of this crime is not often premeditated and occurs most when drugs/alcohol are mixed with a mental illness. Since this crime is not usually premeditated, it could occur because of insanity. This has never been found to be the case, but that should not disqualify it as being a worthy case for insanity. The research paper, “Mass, serial, and sensational homicides” establishes family annihilators as “family annihilators, usually the senior man of the house, who is depressed, paranoid, intoxicated or a combination of these.” He typically eliminates every family member who is present and will even sometimes go as far as killing the family pet. The most notable case of a family annihilator is George Banks, who was a former prison guard in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, that killed 12 of his family members and one bystander. These included his four baby mothers and nine children. George banks killed 8 in his family home before driving down the road and killing four more of his family, as well as a bystander walking past the outside of the home. Although Banks had to travel 15 minutes down the road to kill the other four family members, this case is still considered a mass murder as location does not play a factor. The only circumstance for mass murder is the time interval in which the murder occurs. Most family annihilators kill themselves at the end of their massacre or force the police to kill them, but this was not the case for George Banks.

Psuedocommando mass murderers are those who commit murders using a firearm and ammunition. Psuedocommando killings are typically carried out due to anger and resentment towards those who have physically or emotionally hurt the shooter, or even a location that invokes memories of mistreatment. The anger associated with this type leads him to kill strangers who were in the wrong place at the wrong time. He typically will execute his massacre at a time when the maximum amount of people are present. The article, “The ‘Pseudocommando’ Mass Murderer: Part I, The Psychology of Revenge and Obliteration,” written by James L. Knoll concluded “research suggests that the pseudocommando is driven by strong feelings of anger and resentment, flowing from beliefs about being persecuted or grossly mistreated.” The careful planning and long period of debate before the crime would not classify this case as insanity. These factors prove that the killer had thought about their actions way before the crime was committed, and they had the chance to change their mind. The most relevant cases of psuedocommando murders in the media today are school shootings. This crime is committed after a long period of planning and deliberation. School shooters often exact revenge for the mistreatment they experience at the hands of their peers. An example of this is the case of Parkland school shooter, Nikolas Cruz, who shot and killed 17 of his peers and injured another 17. Cruz was said to be a loner and was expelled from school for disciplinary reasons. Nikolas Cruz took the innocent lives of his peers to fulfill his mission of maximum damage.

Set-and-run killers are arguably the cowards of these different classifications. The main cause for these types of killings remains unknown, but can be estimated to be due to anger and feelings of betrayal by humankind. Set-and-run killers employ devices such as bombs to help them execute the kill without being physically present. This method of murder is seen in terrorists, whether they are domestic or foreign terrorists. They will typically set the bomb down and escape to a place where they can admire their work from a distance. Dietz also states other examples such as “those who bomb buildings or vehicles on which they are not traveling, who set arson fires, or who tamper with food or products, as in the Tylenol poisonings.” With this method, the killer hopes to elude the police. The careful construction of a weapon such as a bomb takes extensive research, planning, and building. Due to the time it takes, this method of mass murder also cannot be established as insanity. If a person takes the time to research and build a weapon of destruction, they are obviously capable of grasping the idea that this crime is illegal. Set-and-run killers sometimes have a single victim in mind such as a political official but consider the surrounding bystanders as collateral to be able to achieve the goal they were hoping to accomplish.

Unlike the mass murderer, a serial killer executes his victims over a period of time, with gaps in time between the kills. To define a series of murders, there must be at least four victims. The article “Mass, serial, and sensational homicide” defines serial murder as “Serial murder involves a string of four or more homicides committed by one or a few perpetrators that span a period of days, weeks, months, or even years.” The FBI Bulletin-August 1985 found that most serial killers are predominately white and are the eldest son.

The explanations/factors for serial killings are endless, but some contributing factors are mental illness, physical/genetic abnormalities, childhood trauma, and traumatic brain injury. “Mass, serial, and sensational homicide” states “while every serial killer is mentally disordered, nearly all are psychopathic sexual sadists, and few, if any, are psychotic. Psychotic offenders rarely have the wherewithal repeatedly to escape apprehension.” Most serial killers do not suffer from a serious mental disorder such as schizophrenia, but many do suffer from an antisocial personality disorder, ADHD, and bipolar. In the mentally unwell state, a serial killer stalks his victims until he decides to make his move. Most serial killers pick their victims based on a certain look. This could be because they find them attractive and do not feel like they have a chance with them, or because the victim reminds them of someone who has hurt them in the past, such as an abusive parent.

There are about five defined types of serial killers. Within these types, the way they kill and the motive for the kill differ. All five typologies of serial killers pick their victims at random and kill over time without being noticed by the police. Each type of serial killer, besides the supposed psychotic killer, will not and should not be granted insanity simply because of the number of times they murder. To kill 4 or more people at different times would be impossible to execute and elude detection by police if the person was insane. The only instance where a supposedly psychotic killer would be granted this defense would be if it had been proven by medical experts that this person has a history of psychosis.

The Psychopathic sexual sadist killer murders for mere gratification and pleasure of the kill. Psychopathic sexual sadist murders are typically the most violent, as the killer is aroused by the pain the victim endures. Many serial killers of this nature commit necrophilia, which is having sexual intercourse with a dead body. “No one is born a serial killer” suggests “From Vernon J. Geberth experience, however, the killer is rarely psychotic. They are usually sexual psychopaths with a deep criminality, and they clearly have a good connection with the reality.” This means that the killer is fully conscious of the crimes he has committed and is not suffering from a mental illness episode. The most notable serial killers of this kind are John Wayne Gacy and Jefferey Dahmer.

Crime spree killers are those who commit murder with other crimes, such as robbery. These types of killers enjoy the thrill that they gain from the power exerted over their victims. The book “The People Behind Murderous Crime Sprees” states “There may also be different motives, such as the need to eliminate witnesses, killing to ensure getaway, or the need to kill for killing’s sake.” These killers kill in at least three locations and at three separate times. The most notable case of crime spree killers is Bonnie and Clyde. During the great depression, this couple traveled through the central United States while committing bank robberies and murdering those who stood in their way.

The organized crime functionaries are those who are contract killers. This means that they are hired to take out someone else’s opponent for money. Although their motive for the killing is money, they also enjoy the power and thrill that the killing provides. The most common form of these killers is political assassins and rival gangs.

Custodial killers are often referred to as “angels of death”. These killers kill the person who is in their care. The article “Serial killers: I. Subtypes, patterns, and motives” gives the example of “The most common examples include “angel of death” cases involving nurses in hospitals or nursing homes who surreptitiously murder ill or elderly patients, usually by asphyxiation or medication overdose.” This type of serial killer contains the highest number of female serial killers, which is uncommon. The serial killer believes they are helping the victim in these cases, but they also enjoy the power that comes with holding someone’s life in their hands.

Psychotic killers are those who experience delusions that convince them to kill. These killers may sometimes believe they need to rid the world of a certain type of person. These killers may experience schizophrenia and/or psychosis, which is a severe mental disorder in which one’s thoughts and emotions are so impaired that they lose touch with reality. “No one is born a serial killer” defines the context of psychotic or psychopathy as “this psychopath term is used when the psychological, biological and genetic factors, as well as the social influences and childhood experiences, helped to develop the syndrome.” This type of serial killer is the only type that could potentially receive a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. This is due to alleged delusions these killers experience, which would keep them from knowingly committing a crime. Even in cases of this nature, many serial killers who try are declared sane by professionals. Ed Gein is the most notorious psychotic killer. He killed two people and dug up over 30 graves and used human skin to make furniture, purses, and shoes.

There are many distinct differences between a mass murderer and a serial killer. The most significant difference between the two is the time constraint. Mass murderers commit their murders in large numbers within 24 hours of each other. Many are typically committed within seconds or minutes of each other. While, serial killers commit their murders over days, weeks, or even years. It is not uncommon for serial killers to go through dormant periods where they contain their compulsions and do not kill. Typically, the first murder after the dormant period is brutal overkill to make up for the lost time.

Serial killers are also much harder to capture. Mass murderers are typically present on the scene at the time of the murders, so it is easy to find them. Some mass murderers do get arrested, but a large number commit suicide or force the police to kill them. In contrast, serial killers escape by the time the police learn of the crime. Different locations make it harder for the police to connect the string of murders, and a serial killer can often go unnoticed for years before the police realize they have a problem.

Serial killers are more feared by the public and often cause community unrest. “Mass, serial, and sensational homicide” claims “massacres do not tend to generate the same level of public fear and anxiety. Until a serial killer is caught, he may be on the loose for weeks, months, or years. Citizens are terrified; they want to protect themselves from becoming the next victim. Each newly discovered murder reenergizes the community’s state of alarm. However, a massacre, though catastrophic, is a single event. By the time the public is informed, the episode is over. There may be widespread horror, but little anxiety.” The public has become fascinated and intrigued over the years, thus making them more popular and feared. As stated before, a serial killer on the loose terrorizes the public until he is caught, but not many people fear a mass murder until it happens, and after the murder, people are more shocked than scared of another event.

Serial killers and mass murderers never sustain a verdict of not guilty due to insanity, but many have tried. This verdict has only been granted in the case of a serial killer one time, and has never been granted to a mass murderer. To qualify for legal insanity, it must be determined that the killer was not aware during the time of the crime that it was an unlawful act. This verdict is difficult to sustain because of the number of times serial killers or mass murderers kill their victims. To truly establish a verdict of insanity, we must first look at the background of the killer and determine what it is that made them kill

Although serial killers and mass murderers are diverse, the twain targets the innocent and finds pleasure in exerting power. The different types of serial killers and mass murders represent all the causes and factors that make one kill. Studies are published every day to try and figure out the reasoning behind the peculiarities of mass and serial murder. Not the most common murders, but serial killings and mass murders are found to be the most fascinating and mind-boggling by the public.

Works Cited

Dietz, Park. (1986). Mass, serial and sensational homicides. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 62. 477-91.

Ioana, Ilie Magdalena. “No One Is Born a Serial Killer!Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, 20 July 2013.

Knoll, J. L. (2010). The “Pseudocommando” Mass Murderer: Part I, The Psychology of Revenge and Obliteration. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online38(1), 87–94.

Miller, Laurence. “Serial Killers: I. Subtypes, Patterns, and Motives.” Aggression and Violent Behavior, Pergamon, 14 Nov. 2013.

Ressler, R.K., Burgess, A.W., Douglas, J.E., & Depue, R.L. (1985). Violent crime. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 54 (8), 2 – 31.

This entry was posted in Definition Rewrite, Portfolio Shxrkbait, shxrkbait. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Definition Rewrite-shxrkbait

  1. shxrkbait's avatar shxrkbait says:

    I would like feedback on the content and organization of my definition argument.

  2. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Style note before I examine your content and organization, please.

    As you will remember from the Vancouver Robust Verbs exercise, the weakest subjects and verbs are, for example, “It” and “is,” a pronoun and the verb to be.

    Your Introduction does not immediately launch an argument, so it requires something powerful or vivid to justify its existence. Here are your subjects and verbs:

    —The difference lies.
    —The action will be classified.
    —Mass murder and serial murder are types.
    —Fear are what.

    Pretty weak. Take another look at the language of the Introduction. What powerful nouns or adjectives can you convert to verbs to put some punch into your language?

    Mass murderers terrorize us by slaughtering random victims all at once, making everywhere feel unsafe. Serial murderers horrify us by patiently plotting multiple murders to fit patterns, making us fearful of belonging to any group. The media stoke our fear by publicizing every sensational multiple murder, whether serial or mass. We’re urged to be fearful, but we’re rarely truly at risk, at least statistically.

    I don’t know if that last sentence was your point, but it clearly MAKES a point. Be sure every paragraph does.

  3. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Without knowing WHY you want to classify murderers into types, Shxrkbait, readers will not naturally care. Your first Content Paragraph elaborates on the qualifications for mass murderer but without investing readers with a motivation to learn the difference. Is there a type we’re more likely to encounter? Do we figure out how to prevent them by understanding the patterns mass murderers follow?

    Your paragraph is actually two paragraphs.
    —The first identifies the characteristics.
    —The second, beginning with “Park Elliot Dietz,” has an entirely different job: to muddy the qualifications.

    What is the argument value of this process? You define a term then let an authority question the terms? I’m intrigued, but I’m not seeing the value yet.

  4. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    You provide valuable insight into motivation in your Second Content Paragraph:

    Inside the classification of mass murders lies three defined types. All three types operate with a common goal, to inflict maximum damage on a specific group of people or a specific geographic location. For some mass murderers the specific group of people could be family members or coworkers. For other mass murders it could be to get revenge on a certain location that they experienced negative encounters at. For mass murders, these acts are carried out quickly and can wipe a large number of people out in a single incident.

    Those of us keeping count get confused. You promised us three types.
    —Max damage on a group or location is common to all three.
    —Family members or co-workers is one type, I guess.
    —Location revenge is the second type, I guess.
    —Quick and big is common to all types, so it’s not the third type, I guess.

    So, what’s the third type?

  5. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Your George Banks paragraph is valuable for the term “family annihilator.” I understand this is your Definition Argument, where I should not expect to find Causal Arguments, so I’m willing to postpone my satisfaction on that point, but while we’re classifying and enumerating (counting bodies and locations), shouldn’t you tell us whether Banks had to go to four houses to find his victims? It’s mass in numbers, but might also be serial in time if travel was involved.

  6. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Your Commando paragraph is confusing to me. It has a LOT of characteristics to cover, which is understandable. But its sources don’t reflect on the characteristics we think they’ll illustrate. You name Revenge and Anger as motivations. Then suggest school shooters as an example. But you don’t connect school shooters to revenge for mistreatment. You say they follow long planning, for which you offer the Huberty case because he assembled an arsenal, I guess. But his murder of 21 people at McDonalds appears to have no explanation other than, perhaps, to end in Huberty’s death. What am I missing about this collection of facts?

  7. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Set-and-run killers are clearly mass murderers, but they might also be terrorists, right? Again, I know it’s hard to separate the categories from the motivations, but you try to do so at first by suggesting anger and revenge trigger set-and-run killings. Tainting Tylenol is hard to put into that category, isn’t it, unless the killer had a VERY DEEP grudge against the makers of an innocuous pain reliever?

  8. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Your omnibus “Serial Killer” paragraph contains this perplexing comment:

    The motivation for serial killings are endless but some contributing factors are mental illness, physical/genetic abnormalities, childhood trauma and traumatic brain injury.

    That sounds more like a list of mitigating factors than a list of motivations, Shxrk. Motivations are future-oriented, right?: they are explanations of what an action was taken TO ACHIEVE. Your list is more of an explanation of a CONDITION that explains why a killer couldn’t resist a motivation.

  9. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Your Ed Gein paragraph is a good example of why it’s hard to take any commentary on these matters seriously, at least for me. The terms deployed in just a few sentences to explain behavior include:

    schizophrenia
    psychosis
    severe mental disorder
    brain impairment
    lose touch with reality
    psychosis
    psychopathy
    psychological, biological and genetic factors
    social influences and childhood experiences
    syndrome

    After all that, trying to categorize someone as psychotic or pathological seems like a game of darts.

  10. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    You won’t be surprised to hear that I like your “Serial killers are more feared by the public and often cause the community unrest” paragraph! It echoes the recommendation/model I offered you for your Introduction.

    It’s easy to forget that every essay needs a guiding principle with a purpose, Shxrkbait. The server wants to encourage us to make certain choices of apps, and bevs, and entrees and welcome dessert. She has a plan to execute that process.

    A list of types of things and their characteristics is valuable material, but without a goal, it has nothing to pull readers through. Nobody wants to be read the entire menu, is what I’m saying.

    It’s a little cheesy, I guess, to tease readers that you’re going to advise them how to stay alive by avoiding murder, but it’s an irresistible lure, don’t you think? And numbers may be available to back it up. Where’s the chart that tracks how many people die every year as a result of these various types of killings?

  11. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    Was that at all helpful?
    I can’t wait to see revisions.
    Provisionally graded. Always eligible for Revisions and a Regrade.

  12. shxrkbait's avatar shxrkbait says:

    Thank you I found this feedback very helpful! I will make the necessary corrections and resubmit.

  13. shxrkbait's avatar shxrkbait says:

    I would like feedback on the corrections I have made.

    • davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

      I make it a practice to read every new version of revised posts as new copy, Shxrkbait. It’s fair to me and saves me the painstaking challenge of having to carefully compare two versions of the text for good results. It’s true I CAN compare two versions in the Edit mode, but it’s already extremely time-consuming to read and evaluate the latest versions of posts that are in revision.

      I will take a few moments to do what you’ve asked out of appreciation for the work you’re doing to improve your work, but I don’t want you to expect it on every round of revisions.

      • davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

        It took me fifteen minutes to scroll through the 21 side-by-side versions WordPress collected of your revision sessions. Sadly, I’m not able to consolidate those comparisons to see the “Before any Revisions” version with the “After all Revisions” version. That would have been very helpful. I saw good things on my whirlwind tour, but I’ll still have to read the essay through to see how effective the latest version is.

  14. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    I find these statements contradictory:
    1. The victims of a mass murderer are, in most cases, strangers who happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
    2. The most common cause for these mass casualties are anger or revenge towards people or a certain location.

    One says the victims are unconnected to the killer.
    The other says the victims were targeted personally or by their location.

  15. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    When you approach your final draft, you’ll want to do a FFG edit, Shxrk.

    In this brief passage that spans two paragraphs, you’ve failed for grammar three times:

    With these constraints in mind we are able to establish that although [their] is a time constraint to defining mass murder, the location or [the amount of locations] where the murders take place does not disqualify a string of murders from being defined as mass homicide. Inside the classification of mass murders [lies three measured varieties].

  16. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    And two more just a couple of sentences later. You have trouble with Subject/Verb Agreement (Rule 14)

    There is the family annihilator, the psuedocommando, and the set-and-run killers. The difference in these types of mass murders are important to note to help better understand the cause and how we can prevent ourselves from becoming victims in the future.

  17. davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

    I notice you’ve added commentary that might serve to help readers understand which types of murder they’re more likely to suffer. That’s a good guiding principle to add some MEANING to an essay that is primarily a long list of types.

    Another organizing strategy that might be more relevant to your eventual thesis might be to cluster these murder types into “Reasonable Candidates” and “Unrealistic Candidates” for the insanity defense.

    That would give readers another reason to compare the types with a purpose. As it stands, they’re mostly just being asked to absorb a lot of material and details without an organizing structure.

    I’m impressed with your conscientious attention to the revision process, Shxrkbait.
    I’ve regraded this essay, which is always eligible for further Revision and a Regrade.

  18. shxrkbait's avatar shxrkbait says:

    If more revisions for the content are needed it would be very helpful and greatly appreciated if you could provide them as well.

    • davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

      I don’t think you’re lacking content, Shxrk. I do still believe your post would be improved by some categorizing. Readers working their way through the long list of killer types will wonder why they’re bothering. If you could classify them as “likelier to get away with the insanity defense” and “less likely,” there might be more interest in getting to the end.

  19. shxrkbait's avatar shxrkbait says:

    Thank you for the advice! I have taken your suggestions and added more commentary to categorize between “likely candidates for the insanity defense” and “not likely candidates for the insanity defense.”

    • davidbdale's avatar davidbdale says:

      Nice work, Shxrk. We disagree about whether the ability to painstakingly plan a horrific crime disqualifies the insanity defense, but you don’t have to convince me, only make a credible case.
      Regraded.

Leave a comment